[RFC] SubDAO Aerodrome Flywheel Optimization

TL;DR

The SubDAO’s Aerodrome flywheel currently recompounds 100% of AERO emissions back into veAERO. This proposal codifies a standing rule to redirect 30% of weekly AERO harvest to USDC, held in the SubDAO reserve. The flywheel continues to grow. The DAO also builds a stablecoin buffer. No new multisig. No retainer. No CTX sold.

Background

Why the Aerodrome Flywheel Exists

In 2024, the DAO correctly pivoted away from single-sided DCA strategies (previously tested via Arrakis Pro) toward the Aerodrome flywheel: bribing for AERO emissions on CTX/USDC liquidity pools, accumulating veAERO, and compounding voting power over time. This approach was more capital-efficient and avoided the sustained sell pressure inherent in automated DCA.

What the Flywheel Does Not Do

Recompounding 100% of emissions into veAERO maximises future voting power but converts zero yield into stablecoins. The DAO’s USDC reserves are critically thin.

The Proposal

This proposal asks the DAO to ratify a single standing treasury rule:

70%

  • Recompound into veAERO

  • Flywheel continues to compound. Voting power keeps growing.

30%

  • Convert to USDC → SubDAO Reserve

  • Stablecoin buffer builds weekly. No CTX sold. No new infrastructure.

Additionally:

  • 100% of trading fees already earned in stable-adjacent assets (USDC, ETH) flows directly to the SubDAO reserve without further conversion.
  • The rule applies to all active Aerodrome positions managed by the SubDAO, current and future.
  • The SubDAO retains discretion to temporarily suspend the 30% conversion during extreme market conditions (e.g. AERO price down >60% in a 7-day window) and resume once conditions normalise.

Implementation Mechanics

Current Flow

Step Action Destination
1 SubDAO claims weekly AERO emissions from Aerodrome gauge SubDAO wallet
2 100% of AERO locked into veAERO veAERO position (illiquid)
3 Trading fees claimed SubDAO wallet
4 Ad-hoc decision on fee allocation Varies

Proposed Flow

Step Action Destination
1 SubDAO claims weekly AERO emissions SubDAO wallet
2 70% of AERO locked into veAERO veAERO position (flywheel preserved)
3 30% of AERO swapped to USDC via Aerodrome stable pool SubDAO USDC reserve
4 All trading fees claimed SubDAO wallet
5 Fees in USDC / ETH transferred to SubDAO reserve SubDAO USDC reserve

Who Executes This

The SubDAO multisig signers execute the harvest and conversion as part of their existing weekly operations. No new contract deployments, no new external parties, no additional governance votes per transaction. The rule is set once here; execution is operational.

Swap Execution

The 30% AERO → USDC conversion will use Aerodrome’s native stable pool routing, which minimises slippage on the existing AERO/USDC pair.

Maximum slippage tolerance: 1%.

If slippage exceeds 1% at time of execution, the swap is deferred 24 hours and retried up to three times before the SubDAO may elect to hold AERO until conditions improve.

Financial Projections

Conservative Estimate

Based on current Aerodrome LP position (~$18K in CTX/USDC CL pool) and observed combined APR of 45.6%:

Scenario Annual AERO Yield on ~$18K LP 30% Harvested Est. USDC/Quarter
Bear (35% APR) ~$6,300/yr in AERO ~$1,8900/yr ~$473
Base (45% APR) ~$8,100/yr in AERO ~$2,430/yr ~$608
Bull (60% APR) ~$10,800/yr in AERO ~$3,240/yr ~$810

If you also include rebases (~$52/week = ~$2,700/yr), the total AERO-denominated yield is

Scenario Annual AERO Yield on ~$18K LP 30% of USDC/week Est. USDC/Quarter
Bear ~$140/week ~$42/week ~$546
Base (current) ~$173/week ~$52/week ~$675
Bull ~$220/week ~$66/week ~$858

At base case: roughly $675 USD/quarter from the harvest rule on current LP size. As the veAERO position compounds and LP size grow, this scales proportionally.

Why it Still Matters

  • Every USDC that enters the reserve from yield is a USDC that does not need to come from CTX liquidation or external funding.
  • The reserve builds passively, week over week, without requiring any additional governance action or contributor effort.
  • It establishes a precedent: the DAO manages yield actively, not passively. That matters to institutional counterparties evaluating the project’s operational maturity.

What This Does NOT Change

Item Unchanged? Notes
Aerodrome bribe strategy Yes Bribe amounts, timing, and target pools remain at SubDAO discretion
veAERO lock duration Yes Locking decisions remain unchanged
Liquidity pool composition Yes No change to CTX/USDC pool sizing or rebalancing
SubDAO multisig signers Yes No new signers, no new wallet required
Flywheel compounding rate Slightly reduced 70% vs 100% recompound — growth continues, just at ~70% the prior pace on yield reinvestment

Risk Analysis

Risk Likelihood Impact Mitigation
AERO price drops sharply, reducing USDC yield Medium Low Suspension clause: SubDAO may defer swap if slippage >1%. Bear scenario still produces positive USDC yield.
veAERO compounding grows more slowly Certain (minor) Low The flywheel still grows at 70% of yield. Long-run voting power is slightly reduced, not eliminated.
SubDAO operational burden increases Very Low Very Low One additional swap per week, automated via existing tooling. Estimated <30 min/week additional effort.
AERO liquidity on Aerodrome is insufficient for swap Very Low Low AERO/USDC pool on Aerodrome is deep. 30% of weekly yield is a small fraction of daily volume.

Success Metrics

The SubDAO will include a “Flywheel Optimization Report” section in its existing monthly transparency update, covering:

  • AERO claimed in the period
  • Amount recompounded (70%) vs converted (30%)
  • USDC received from conversion and current SubDAO USDC reserve balance
  • Any suspension events and reason
  • Cumulative USDC added to reserve since rule inception

Target at Six Months

Metric Target (Base Case)
Cumulative USDC added to reserve from harvest > $1,350 USDC
Number of weeks with successful harvest execution > 20 of 26 weeks
Suspension events (slippage/market conditions) < 3
1 Like

Great proposal. The 70/30 split is a reasonable first step toward active yield management without meaningfully hurting the flywheel.

A few notes:

  • The 30% conversion applies to LP emissions only
    rebases auto-compound into locked veNFTs and can’t be converted
  • At current rates this generates ~$52/week in USDC, which is modest but scales with AERO price recovery
  • Execution-wise, this adds one swap to the existing weekly routine
  • The 1% slippage tolerance is more than sufficient for the amounts involved

I’m in favor. If there are no objections from other
contributors we can start implementing this with the next weekly routine.

No objections from me, thank you for this proposal.

One question: Is there any benefit to claiming the USDC less often than weekly (administrative overhead, transaction fees, etc.)?

2 Likes

lets do 75/25. 80/20 is industry standard. I am open to performance progressions. Projecting a net present value would align me with 70/30.

1 Like

Good question. With the dashboard we’ve built, the swap is bundled into the same batched multisig transaction we already execute every week: claims, bribe deposit, vote, swap, and lock all happen in a single tx. So the AERO > USDC swap adds zero additional administrative overhead or transaction cost. It’s just one more step inside the same MultiSend call.

Doing it less frequently would actually mean holding liquid AERO longer without it being locked or converted, idle capital earning nothing.

2 Likes

I endorse this proposal

1 Like

I’m not well versed in subDAO operations and not sure if previous subDAO “tweaking” has even gone thru formal DAO vote. If that’s the path forward, I’m good and have no concerns with this one moving forward. Thanks!

1 Like

Already added this in the Discord chat last week but here is an artifact you could tinker with on NPV projections.

Also, we just wrapped up the Cryptex gov call and decided to stick with the 70/30 split for now. We would observe how this plays out over the coming weeks and would decide whether to adjust then.

Hi everyone!

We endorse this proposal to go up for vote.

1 Like

Hey guys,

Big thanks to @DAOplomats for the solid work here. The breakdown makes a lot of sense and the numbers are laid out very clearly.

I endorse this proposal. While it’s always tempting to just keep reinvesting everything to grow as fast as possible, building up a bit our USDC reserve is just common sense. This 70/30 split lets us keep our momentum while making sure we aren’t caught off guard if things go south.

Allez!

1 Like

Hi guys, while im not very well versed in the requirements for optimization, the idea of building up a usdc purse does in fact sound beneficial to the longevity of the project so I will be endorsing the flywheel optimization proposal when it is up for vote.

1 Like